Workers Compensation
| Standard of Conduct for Representatives of Social Security Claimants |
|
| Those individuals undertaking to represent a social security claimant, whether an attorney or a non-attorney, must adhere to a certain standard of conduct. In particular, representatives appearing on behalf of a claimant before the Social Security Administration (SSA) must comply with the SSA's Rules of Conduct and Standards of Responsibility for Representatives (Rules of Conduct). More... |
|
|
| Types of workers compensation laws |
|
| Applicability of the LHWCA requires that the situs and status tests be met, i.e. the injury must have occurred on United States navigable waters or adjoining area by a maritime worker as specified in the LHWCA. It appears that the LHWCA was conceived to fill a gap in workers' compensation coverage by providing benefits to those employees who were not injured on land, which would then be covered under the applicable state's Workers' Compensation Act. However, the expansion of the interpretation as to what is the "adjoining area" of navigable waters has allowed for conflicts of law questions to arise for maritime workers. Caselaw suggests that when the LHWCA does not clearly apply under the status and situs tests, each case will be examined on its own facts to determine the source of the injured employee's benefits. Notably, Louisiana denies state workers' compensation benefits to an employee who is covered by the LHWCA. More... |
|
|
| Refusal of Employment as Employer Defense |
|
| Workers' compensation disability benefits are payable based on the nature of the employee's work-related injury or illness and the employee's corresponding lack of earning capacity. When an employee can return to work, his disability benefit payments will cease. In some instances, an employee's benefits are based on his inability to obtain work due to his condition. However, employers may counter that the fault lies with the employee, not his condition, because the employee has unreasonably refused to engage in suitable work. For example, an employer may prevail when an employee refuses a lighter work position offered by his employer. The employer carries the burden of demonstrating that the employee possesses the ability to perform the offered position. More... |
|
|
| On-Call Employees |
|
| Professions that may require employees to reside on the premises and be "on-call" include servants, security guards, private nurses, nannies, and the like. Continuously on-call employees who reside on their work premises are generally covered under the "course of employment" principle should they be injured. If the employee is not always on-call but, rather, has only specified hours in which he is on-call, he will only be allowed compensation if the injury was due to his living conditions as a by-product of the employer's requirement that he remain on the premises. More... |
|
|
| Employee Misconduct That Does and Does Not Deviate From Employment |
|
| When an employee engages in misconduct, his receipt of workers' compensation benefits can be jeopardized depending on whether such misconduct constituted a deviation from his course of employment. If the employee has deviated from the course of employment, and is then injured, he will generally be denied benefits. Prohibited conduct is a marker for misconduct. It is only that prohibited conduct concerning the employee's fundamental job for which he was employed that will affect compensation eligibility. Even though prohibited, conduct that merely violates the way or means that an employee uses to accomplish his job duties is still within the course of his employment. More... |
|
|